Upholding Individual, State then National Sovereignty against the Enforcement of Global Governence and Tyranny

Posts Tagged ‘Dec16 UPDATE Obama and HR1540 National Defense Authorization Act

Dec14 – 31 *UPDATE* Obama Signs HR1540 – National Defense Authorization Act 2012 NOW Law

with 4 comments

 After passing both the Senate and House, a conference committee was created to work out differences between the Senate and House versions of the bill. A conference report resolving those differences passed

Dec 14, 2011: in the House of Representatives, the totals were 283 Ayes, 136 Nays, 14 Present/Not Voting.

Dec 15, 2011: in the Senate, the totals were 86 Ayes, 13 Nays, 1 Present/Not Voting.

 Introduced Apr 14, 2011

 Reported by Committee May 11, 2011

 Passed House May 26, 2011

 Passed Senate Dec 1, 2011

 Differences Resolved Dec 14-15, 2011

Sent to the President to sign Dec 21, 2011 

* HR 1540 Signed by PresidentOn Saturday Dec 31 Signed the NDAA of 2012

The White House – Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release – December 31, 2011
Statement by the President on H.R. 1540


Today I have signed into law H.R. 1540, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.” I have signed the Act chiefly because it authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, crucial services for service members and their families, and vital national security programs that must be renewed. In hundreds of separate sections totaling over 500 pages, the Act also contains critical Administration initiatives to control the spiraling health care costs of the Department of Defense (DoD), to develop counterterrorism initiatives abroad, to build the security capacity of key partners, to modernize the force, and to boost the efficiency and effectiveness of military operations worldwide.

Last WH press release had been on 12/15/2011…

Press Briefing Room, by Press Secretary Jay Carney;

Q    You had objections to the defense bill; you’ve dropped them.  There’s still a lot of civil liberties experts who are convinced that that bill contains the seed of the future detention ofU.S.citizens indeterminately if they’re suspected of terrorism.  Are you really that convinced that there was a big enough change that you’d drop an important issue like this?

MR. CARNEY:  Well, let me make clear that this was not the preferred approach of this administration, and we made clear that any bill that challenges or constrains the President’s critical authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the nation would prompt the President’s senior advisors to recommend a veto.

After intensive engagement by senior administration officials, the administration has succeeded in prompting the authors of the detainee provisions to make several important changes, including the removal of problematic provisions.

While we remain concerned about the uncertainty that this law will create for our counterterrorism professionals, the most recent changes give the President additional discretion in determining how the law will be implemented, consistent with our values and the rule of law, which are at the heart of our country’s strength.

This legislation authorizes critical funding for military personnel overseas, and its passage sends an important signal that Congress supports our efforts as we end the war in Iraq and transition to Afghan lead, while ensuring that our military can meet the challenges of the 21st century.

On the provision in particular that you reference, it does not increase or otherwise change any of our authorities in regard to detention of American citizens.  It is simply a restatement of the authorities that were granted to the President in 2001.

Q    Is this just a recognition that ultimately the courts would settle disputes like that?

MR. CARNEY:  No, the changes give discretion to the President in the implementation of this law.  If, as this law is being implemented, the President feels that our counterterrorism professionals are being constrained and that their flexibility is being constrained in a way that does not reflect our values, then he will ask for changes.  He will go to the authors of these provisions and ask for legislative changes that are separate from the defense authorization bill.

But again, the changes that were made were sufficient to allow senior advisors to withdraw the recommendation of a veto, but we are still concerned about the uncertainty that this law creates.


President Obama’s NDAA Signing Statement: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t


Happy New Year: Obama Signs NDAA, Indefinite Detention Now Law of the Land


Obama Signs Martial Law Bill: NDAA Now Law

NDAA is a Declaration of War on the United States by the United States

%d bloggers like this: