Upholding Individual, State then National Sovereignty against the Enforcement of Global Governence and Tyranny

Archive for July 2nd, 2010

Zbigniew Brzezinki – CFR Montreal Conference Text

with 17 comments

Zbigniew Brzezinski – At CFR conference in Montreal

On the Two New Global Oppositions to Global Governance


CFR Goals of Global Imperialism and World Domination Sees Difficult Times Ahead. Derailing Sounds warning of B/O (bush/obama) Railroading to Increase.

       “Let me begin by making just a thumbnail definition of the geo-political context in which we all find ourselves, including America.

And in my perspective that geo-political context is very much defined by Two New Global Realities.

The first is that global political leadership by which I mean by the role of curtain leading powers in the world has become much more diversified unlike what is was until relatively recently. relatively recently still the world was dominated by the Atlantic world as it had been for many centuries. It no Longer is. Today the rise of the Far east has created a new but more differentiated global leadership. one which in a nutshell involves if one could hazard an arbitrary list of primary players on the world scene. The united states clearly, maybe next to it but maybe the European Union, I say maybe because it not yet a political entity. Certainly, increasingly so and visibly so, China, Russia Mainly in one respect only, because it is a nuclear power, co equal to the United States, but otherwise very deficient in all of the major indices what constitutes global power. 

Behind Russia perhaps individually, but to a much lesser extent, Germany, France, Great Britain, Japan certainly although it does not have the political assertive posture and India is rising.

And then in the background of that we have the new entity of the G20.

A much more diversified global leadership, lacking internal unity, with many of its members in bilateral antagonisms. That makes the context much more complicated.

The other major change in international affairs is for the first time in all of human history, mankind is politically awakened. That’s a total new reality, Total new reality. It has not been so for most of human history until the last 100 years and in the course of the last 100 years the whole world has become politically awakened and no matter where you go politics is a matter of social engagement and most people generally know what is going on generally going on in the world and are consciously aware of global iniquities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.

Mankind is now politically awaked and stirring.

The combination of the two, the diversified global leadership, politically awakened masses makes a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently, the leading world power, the United States.”

Question: “I really enjoyed your presentation but I’m wondering how would you rate the United Nations in helping solve some of the geopolitical problems that we’ve had. Some people say they are not adding a lot of solutions and some people even suggest we should have another organization internationally to do the jobs the United Nations should be doing. And even people talking about one world governments, I mean how do you view the UN right now?”

Zbigniew Brzezinksi: “Well you know there should be such an organization. The word should implies that there is a kind of moral imperative or need it, but it doesn’t it exist. Why doesn’t it exist, because we do a situation in which there is a concentrated source of power that has universal reach. Not even America has that. So the United Nation functions well in areas in which it is possible to generate consensus. And that deals usually with areas pertaining to human suffering, or to well being, or to health. The food organization, the health organization, the relief agencies or arbitration of conflicts of secondary importance. In which the international community can kind of endorse what the UN is doing.

But the UN is not a world government. The UN when it comes to politics is based out of fiction. Namely 190 states which are members, each of which is coequal with the others, except for the five that have the veto right, in the security council. So it is an organization which reflects ongoing diversity of the world. And in that we have a consequence, we have to realize that real solutions for political problems, to political conflicts come from those entities that have power have the willingness to or the ability coalesce or get stymied in the process or even go into conflict.

The UN can deal with areas regarding which there is a great deal of international consensus like the ones I’ve mentioned and that reality is going to continue for some time to come.”

“The Technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities”

  – Zbigniew Brzezinksi from his 1970’s book “Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era.


with 7 comments




Lieutenant Civilian Common Man

United States Plain Dumb Public Reservoirs

Captain Smedley Butler

Project Adviser

This SRP(CE) is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of a Moral Individual of a Personal Honesty Studies Degree. The U.S. Plain Dumb Public Reservoir School of Life is discredited by the Commission on Higher Education of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, The Commission on Higher Education is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

The views expressed in this civilian academic research paper edit are those of the author and do not reflect anywhere close to the official policy or position of the Department of the Army,

Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

U.S. Army War College

Unfortunately their view stands very close to the Original Research Project and have,

“become “internationally minded.” We forgot, or shunted aside, the advice of the Father of our country. We forgot George Washington’s warning about “entangling alliances.” We went to war. We acquired outside territory.” – War Is A Racket

The ongoing U.S. drug war, civil war and government crimes in Mexico is a severe problem all but ignored by the U.S. government and the media.

The fact is many common factors directly link the U.S. to Mexico’s collective deterioration and continuing destruction. The relationship between the two countries is complex, plagued by distrust, National Sovereignty Violations, and Demands Internal changes to respect; National Sovereignty (Economic Freedom), Individual Liberties and Civil Rights by both sides. This would begin to remove Government created marketplaces for Prohibition Cartels and Violent Syndicates that arise around Internal Laws and Policey.

The implications of an unstable Mexico or an uncooperative relationship between the U.S. and Mexico are critical to national security at best or Personal Liberty, Individual Life and Peace at worst.

Largely, Mexico is considered first line of defense against crime, drugs, terrorism, arms trafficking, and human trafficking but it should be considered last or at the very least only after our internal policy is constitutional, just or complete.

Considering Mexico as the first line of defense without addressing the causes of the endemic problems will only continue the U.S. demands, that Mexico be responsible for the symptoms of U.S. Policy; In effect forcing the increase in demand for Mexico’s violations against their citizen’s Industry, Individual Liberties, Safety and Prosperity and can only result in Civil Conflict.

These are National Sovereignty Violations inflicted on Mexico at the demands or results of the U.S.

In the midst of a massive Mexican offensive against violent drug traffickers, (the ‘narco-terrorism’ rebellion), Mexico faces the possibility of failing as a state.

Narco-Terrorism is a revolution conducted to further the aims of prohibition cartels and distributors. It has included assassinations, extortion, hijackings, bombings, kidnappings; directed against judges, prosecutors, elected officials, or law enforcement agents and general disruption of government.

If Mexico continues to attempt to suppress the ‘narco-terrorist’s’ violence and regain an internal military police state, both the U.S. and Mexico will feel the effects on their economy, immigration, and national security.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has deeply consolidated Mexican economic dependence on the U.S.

Since the NAFTA ratification1993, trade between Mexico and the U.S. has increased from $49 billion in 1994 to $210 billion in 2007. Mexico exports about 80% of all its products to the U.S. while the U.S. exports about 12% of its products to Mexico.

To break this Monopoly trade imbalance with the U.S. economy and U.S. International Corporations, Mexico continues to attempt market diversification with limited success. As recently, the weakening of the U.S. stock market and decline of the dollar greatly affected the Mexican economies ability to expand and has only increased Mexico’s dependence.

That deep dependence of the Mexican economy has massively negative affects within Mexico. Because of the current trade imbalances and dependency, the U.S. economy and U.S. firms control the Mexican economy and any suggested changes in U.S. policy have massive leverage, pull and effect, creating a very capricious economy and untrusted ineffectual government.

Migrant workers in the U.S. from Mexico are considered critical to a strong U.S. and Mexican economy; however, the decades of destructive U.S. Policy has destroyed the Mexican economic landscape to this point of starvation and civil war causing the influx of ‘migrant workers’ (that should be called economic and political refugees). This decades long influx has caused a massive decline in the lowest wage earning jobs and families in the U.S. caused by ‘illegal’ employment trafficking and slave practices in the U.S. A large percentage of Mexican economic and political refugees take wages and conditions that ‘legal’ employees would not accept.

This has caused immigration to be a contentious topic for both countries and takes much of the focus, as a symptom, away from the true causes of the decline, violations, war and violence.

2007 estimates place Mexican illegal immigrants currently in the U.S. from 6 to 12 Million or roughly 5%-10% of Mexico’s population.

While illegal immigration can strain U.S. social services, allowing Mexico’s

government to fail while struggling against U.S. substance policy, drug cartels or  violent attacks by way of increased violations of Individual Liberty and Civil Rights could have catastrophic consequences.

If we hope to prevent a Totalitarian Mexico, instead of the Tyrannically Governed Mexico and future infringements on Rights and Liberties among the citizens of the U.S. and Mexico, it is essential for the U.S. and Mexico to reassess and create new comprehensive and mutually supporting, substance laws, non-violent drug decriminalization, border enforcement and refugee policies.

Another important security consideration in our relationship with Mexico revolves around Mexico’s role as a Ruler in Latin America and with the Caribbean countries. By Latin American standards, Mexico has a strong economy and military, second only to Brazil. As a result, Mexico wields substantial influence with countries like Venezuela and Cuba where Individual Lives, Liberty and Rights are in constant danger and Risk Mexico Support in Defense against the U.S.

The U.S. has strained relations with many of the Sovereign Latin American and Caribbean Nations Since 1898, when the U.S. first took colonialism territory outside the mainland of North America and Imperial ‘Big Stick’ (Pay Your Private Bank Debts or Disruption/Overthrown/Invasion/Starvation) Diplomacy.

We must abandon ‘War College’ mindsets and Promote Self Sufficient Sovereign Nations that Support Individual Liberties and Freedoms for All Natural Persons.

Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.

To be a spotless example of that dream. Have we forgotten the American Dream, Life, Liberty, Freedom and Justice for All?

(Mainstream Government and Military Perspective)

ATF’s Fast and Furious Seems Colored With Shades of Iran/Contra Scandal

%d bloggers like this: